CLAIM

Long vesting schedules for community members are a turnoff.

Investor / ScaleWeb3

Large token airdrops can hurt a price. However, long vesting schedules disincentivize people. As an investor (long-term as well as short-term), you'd be happy about long vesting for project owners but incentivized community members should vest no longer than a month.

ARGUMENTS

For

Mattison Asher

Long vesting schedules disincentivize participation from the community. The community contributes work early on by taking the risk of being early users. They deserve to have that work be recognized when it is given, and shouldn’t be under a vesting schedule.

For

ennge121

The long vesting schedule is shortened to allow the number of participants to grow quickly!

Against

CurlyBracketEffect

Whales dumping on the market at launch hurts the project more and is an even bigger turnoff

Against

karthikeyanramachandran

Long vesting schedules are required to differentiate loyal community members from causal bounty hunters. It will also prevent users from dumping the tokens prematurely without understanding the full potential of the projects.

Against

zembiker

long vesting schedule have to be executed smartly. otherwise it could be a turnoff.